[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 20, Issue 2 (8-2025) ::
2025, 20(2): 59-59 Back to browse issues page
Ethical Model of Gender Justice in Education (Based on the Adaptation of Morteza Motahari and John Rawls' Perspective)
Hakimeh Safa1 , Aliasghar Mashinchi2 , Mokhtar Ranjbar3
1- 1. Ph.D. Student of Philosophy of Islamic Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Lamard Branch, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Science, Islamic Azad University, Lamard branch, Lamard, Iran. , a.mashinchi56@gmail.com
3- Department of Public Administration, Lamard Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamard, Iran.
Abstract:   (46 Views)
Background: Gender equality and fair treatment of women and girls is a moral imperative. The purpose of the current research is to present the moral model of gender justice in education based on the adaptation of Morteza Motahari and John Rawls.
Method: This research is practical in terms of goals and comparative content analysis in terms of data collection method. The society and the research field included books, articles and researches that dealt with education from the point of view of Morteza Motahari and John Rawls, and with a purposeful and criteria-based sampling method, on the condition of being relevant and up-to-date, which is the most relevant to the subject. 130 cases were selected from them. The method of data analysis was the coding method (open coding, axial coding and selective coding).
Results: The data analysis finally led to the identification of 4 dimensions, 16 components and 48 indicators, and the research model was formed.
Conclusion: Ethical components in the form of 4 components and 12 indicators and anthropological components in the form of 4 components and 12 indicators and epistemological components in the form of 4 components and 12 indicators and psychological components in the form of 4 components and 12 indicators were identified.
Keywords: Ethics, Gender justice, Morteza Motahari, John Rawls
Full-Text [PDF 863 kb]   (42 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/04/4 | Accepted: 2024/07/8 | Published: 2025/08/23
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Safa H, Mashinchi A, Ranjbar M. Ethical Model of Gender Justice in Education (Based on the Adaptation of Morteza Motahari and John Rawls' Perspective). Ethics in Science and Technology 2025; 20 (2) :59-59
URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-3272-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 2 (8-2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری Ethics in Science and Technology
Creative Commons License
All works in this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714