[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 14 - ::
2020, 14 - : 125-132 Back to browse issues page
Relationship between Social Capital and the Components of Professional Ethics of Faculty Members
Abstract:   (1736 Views)
Background: The most well-known aspect of professionalism in the faculty is professional ethics. Professional ethics at the university is a set of ethical principles and standards of conduct that determine the behavior of its members. In fact, academic professional ethics is a process of rational thinking that aims to realize scientific values ​​in the scientific community and how to maintain and disseminate it.
Method: The present study is a combination of correlation and post-event method and its statistical population is all respected faculty members of universities around the country. From this statistical population 435 faculty members were selected using stratified random sampling method. Is. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 7 components and 30 items. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Pearson and Spearman correlation test, structural equation modeling test, one-sample t-test and analysis of variance). Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 and LISREL 8/80 statistical software.
 Results: The components of professional ethics in order of priority with respect to the mean score are: scientific responsibility, self-reliance, professional ethics, belief in social responsibility, communication capital, cognitive capital, social capital, sense of belonging, and scientific community. Structural capital has been respected.
Conclusion: Although the professional ethics of faculty members are rated above average, there is still a large gap with desirable status.
 
 
Keywords: Social capital, Professional ethics, Faculty members
Full-Text [PDF 777 kb]   (713 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/03/5 | Accepted: 2020/03/5 | Published: 2020/03/5
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Relationship between Social Capital and the Components of Professional Ethics of Faculty Members. Ethics in Science and Technology 2020; 14 :125-132
URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-1675-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14 - Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری Ethics in Science and Technology
Creative Commons License
All works in this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660