Background: The model of resistance economy, which was prepared and presented with the guidance of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution and a group of economists, has two general types of responsibilities. One type of responsibility has a general status and the general public and organizations have duties and responsibilities to improve the economic situation of the country, and the second type are responsibilities that are clearly and explicitly assigned to specific institutions and organizations. The aim of the present study was the ethical pathology of implementing the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economy.
Method: The present study was a descriptive-correlational study that was conducted by survey method. The statistical population included the staff and managers of the Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture and the Chamber of Guilds, the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Trade, 300 of whom were selected as a statistical sample by simple random sampling. The measurement tool for data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire on ethical pathology of the implementation of the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economics. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling method using PlS software.
Results: The results showed that all questions have a significant effect (P <0.01) in the model. The fit indices of the structural model have a good fit, and also the results show that the amount of variance extractedBackground: The model of resistance economy, which was prepared and presented with the guidance of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution and a group of economists, has two general types of responsibilities. One type of responsibility has a general status and the general public and organizations have duties and responsibilities to improve the economic situation of the country, and the second type are responsibilities that are clearly and explicitly assigned to specific institutions and organizations. The aim of the present study was the ethical pathology of implementing the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economy.
Method: The present study was a descriptive-correlational study that was conducted by survey method. The statistical population included the staff and managers of the Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture and the Chamber of Guilds, the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Trade, 300 of whom were selected as a statistical sample by simple random sampling. The measurement tool for data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire on ethical pathology of the implementation of the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economics. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling method using PlS software.
Results: The results showed that all questions have a significant effect (P <0.01) in the model. The fit indices of the structural model have a good fit, and also the results show that the amount of variance extracted and the common denominator for the ethical pathology of the implementation of the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economy is 0.416.
Conclusion: Incomplete, unscientific implementation and disregard for business ethics (such as meritocracy, transparency, fight against corruption and rent, etc.), has caused that despite many efforts, commercial policies continue to the basis of the approach of resistance economics in the implementation of have not achieved significant success. and the common denominator for the ethical pathology of the implementation of the general commercial policies of the country with the approach of resistance economy is 0.416.
Conclusion: Incomplete, unscientific implementation and disregard for business ethics (such as meritocracy, transparency, fight against corruption and rent, etc.), has caused that despite many efforts, commercial policies continue to the basis of the approach of resistance economics in the implementation of have not achieved significant success.