[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 3 (12-2019) ::
2019, 14(3): 99-107 Back to browse issues page
Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research
Abstract:   (2210 Views)
Background: The role of the valid research and its proper implementation in the overall ascendency state of the society is obvious, and the promotion of the quality of research and, consequently, the improvement of the life and welfare of the people of society in the light of moral values ​​is possible. The advancement of science will be possible in the shade of all the principles of professional ethics of research. In this regard, it is appropriate to identify and prioritize research ethics indicators and their importance.
Method: This research in terms of the purpose is practical and in terms of collecting information is descriptive-survey. Statistical population is consisting of faculty members of Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, 17 experts were selected. About selecting experts we have used targeted sampling. To identify Indicators, we use library method and for settling and prioritizing, we use questionnaire.  About data analysis methods, fuzzy Delphi method for riddling and fixing the indicators and the best-worst method to determining the relative importance of research method are determined.
Results: After analyzing data, 18 indicators during three phases of doing F-Delphi method are confirmed and chosen. The convergence index is less than 0.2 that indicated complete validation of results. According to the solution of the linear-modeling method of the best-worst method, the relative importance of the indicators is determined and consistency rate is in an acceptable level, showed the validity of results.
Conclusion: The results indicate that considering the welfare of society, respect for justice and preservation of unity at the macro level and respect for intellectual property rights are the most important indicators of professional ethics in research, respectively.
 
 

 
Keywords: Professional ethics, Research, Decision-making
Full-Text [PDF 411 kb]   (731 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/12/6 | Accepted: 2019/12/6 | Published: 2019/12/6
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research. Ethics in Science and Technology 2019; 14 (3) :99-107
URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-1540-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 3 (12-2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری Ethics in Science and Technology
Creative Commons License
All works in this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645