[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 17, Issue 2 (9-2022) ::
2022, 17(2): 16-21 Back to browse issues page
Peer-reading Process and Its Ethical Challenges: Can We Hope for Moral Judgment?
Abstract:   (665 Views)
Background: The role of refereeing and peer-reading in the ethics of research and publishing is very privileged and vital, and changes have occurred in this important part of scientific communication over the years. Despite the diversity in scientific judgments and the criticisms and challenges that have been brought to its implementation and nature, it is still accepted as a social norm in the scientific community. The current research is a review of the criticisms and challenges raised by researchers to this scientific approach.
Conclusion: These criticisms range from defects in the function and implementation process to aspects such as the personalization of peer reading, the obvious or hidden negative effect of identity, the possibility of abuse, the lack of a suitable and trained referee, the existence of various types of bias and conflicts of interests in the refereeing, which make the refereeing ethical. has faced serious questions. A general overview of these criticisms along with familiarity with the important components of moral judgment can help to improve this scientific process.
Keywords: Peer review, Refereeing process, Peer review ethics, Criticisms and challenges, Publication ethics committee (COPE)
Full-Text [PDF 318 kb]   (257 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/08/15 | Accepted: 2020/10/17 | Published: 2022/08/28
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Peer-reading Process and Its Ethical Challenges: Can We Hope for Moral Judgment?. Ethics in Science and Technology 2022; 17 (2) :16-21
URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-2661-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 17, Issue 2 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری Ethics in Science and Technology
Creative Commons License
All works in this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645