1- Ph.D. Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, Iran. 2- Department of Law, Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, Iran. , mb.amerinia1977@gmail.com 3- Department of Law, Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, Iran.
Abstract: (281 Views)
Background: After the Islamic revolution, the government's view of the working class and their effective role in the victory of the revolution changed. Analyzing and submerging the labor class discourse in the discourse of the Islamic Republic and the ways out, articulation and reconstruction of the labor discourse is one of the main goals of this research. The issue here is how the Islamic Republic, by articulating various discursive elements, has used "language", "slogans", "speeches", "intimidation", "repression" in order to form its hegemonic formation. Research question: "Has the discourse of the Islamic Republic caused the collapse of the labor discourse?" Conclusion: In this research, relying on the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe, "opposition" is used as an analytical tool to examine how the discourse of the Islamic Republic tries to alienate the labor discourse. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the discourse of the Islamic Republic after the revolution tried to destroy the unity of the labor discourse and it succeeded to some extent in doing so, but the increase in moral awareness, the search for justice, the change of class thinking and the recognition of the needs of the classes, the possibility of coalition It has made a discourse possible. The achievement of the research is to confirm the concept of alienating the discourse of the Islamic Republic from the labor discourse and its collapse
Basir M B, Amerinia M B, Janipour K. Moral Responsibilities and Judicial Security in Criminal Proceedings. Ethics in Science and Technology 2025; 19 (4) :108-115 URL: http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-3047-en.html